Re: Sleepycat documents incorrect?

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

Seems like a question more appropriately asked in a
Berkeley DB forum, e.g. news:comp.databases.berkeley-db

Kurt

At 05:47 PM 5/20/2004, Micah Anderson wrote:
>According to http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/api_c/env_set_cachesize.html:
>
>"(All sizes are in powers-of-two, that is, 256KB is 2^32 not 256,000.)"
>
>This doesn't make sense to me, 2^32 would be 4G, where 256kb is
>actually 2^18 (at least NORMALLY). Isn't this a mistake? Should it
>read, "256kb is 2^18 not 256000"?
>
>If so, this needs to be corrected, as this is pretty critically wrong.
>
>micah