Re: LDAP Sync or Slurpd?

[Ottavio Campana <ottavio@campana.vi.it>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Syncrepl is supposed to be the eventual replacement for slurpd, since 
> slurpd isn't maintained overall.  There are a number of advantages to 
> syncrepl over slurpd long term.  Faster updates (we currently have an 
> issue with the speed at which slurpd replicates, so we give a few select 
> systems access to the master) is one on our list.  Another interesting 
> capability with syncrepl is that you can give a specific replica its own 
> access rule, which means that you can replicate not only subtrees, but 
> only certain entries in subtrees.

will it support multimaster replica?