[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: openldapRootDSE and solaris clients
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Greg Matthews wrote:
> In the past (version 2.1.22) I have been able to:
>
> sidhean openldap # ldapsearch -xLLLs base -b ""
> dn:
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: OpenLDAProotDSE
> structuralObjectClass: OpenLDAProotDSE
> namingContexts: dc=my,dc=base
> supportedControl: 1.2.826.0.1.334810.2.3
> supportedControl: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.10.1
> supportedControl: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.10.2
> supportedControl: 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.2
> supportedControl: 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.18
> supportedExtension: 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037
> supportedExtension: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.11.1
> supportedExtension: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.11.3
> supportedFeatures: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.1
> supportedFeatures: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.2
> supportedFeatures: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.3
> supportedFeatures: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.4
> supportedFeatures: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.5
> supportedLDAPVersion: 2
> supportedLDAPVersion: 3
> supportedSASLMechanisms: DIGEST-MD5
> supportedSASLMechanisms: CRAM-MD5
>
> However, on a recent build (2.1.25) i find:
>
> budbase scripts # ldapsearch -xLLLs base -b ""
> dn:
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: OpenLDAProotDSE
>
> Unfortunately this breaks the Solaris client configurator ldapclient(1)
> because it cannot find the naming context. Adding a '+' to the above
> search shows that the required attribute is there just not returned.
>
> I have seen a reference to this from Jan 2001 in the mailing list. why
> does the 2.1.22 work and the 2.1.25 not? is it a configure option that I
> missed? Anyone seen this problem with sol client? workaound?
>
This was either a bug in 2.1.22 or you applied some patch. I wrote one a
long time ago which is floating around the internet.
--
Igor