Re: Upgrade from 2.0.x: 2.1.x or 2.2.x?

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>]

--On Thursday, April 22, 2004 7:45 AM +0800 Canggung Mendonan 
<mendonan@absolute-p.ath.cx> wrote:

> Dear list,
>
> Sorry if this have been asked before (have tried searching archives). I've
> been running OpenLDAP 2.0.27 as authentication server & address book since
> 2001, and it's been running fine. Been trying to perform the 2.0.x to
> 2.1.x upgrade but kept putting it off (fixing something that isn't broken
> always gets to the bottom of the priority ;-) ).
>
> Recently FreeBSD ports (the platform I'm using) begins to warn that the
> 2.0.x port will be removed in May, and recommend me to upgrade to 2.2.x.
> That's saying to me 'upgrade now, everybody's upgraded already'. However,
> the jump from 2.0.x to 2.2.x might be too far, and 2.2.x has no 'stable'
> version yet. What do you recommend I upgrade to (considering my poor rate
> of upgrading): to 2.1.x or 2.2.x?

2.2.  The differences between 2.1 and 2.2 are minor when looking at the 
general operation, and 2.1 is nearing end of life.  We are running 2.2 in 
production at this time.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html