RE: benchmarks &real world

["John Smith" <temp201@hotmail.com>]

"Howard Chu" wrote:
> I've played with DirectoryMark a few times, after seeing it bandied about. 
> In
> fact, the data set that it uses is randomly generated, so there is no
> canonical fixed data set. Nor is there a standardized job mix or load 
> factor.
> In articles I've seen that report DirectoryMark figures, these critical 
> input
> parameters are not included. As such, none of the published results I've 
> ever
> seen could be compared to any concrete reference, which makes the usage of
> DirectoryMark rather meaningless.


Well, what other/better benchmark do you suggest then ?


Sincerely,

John Smith

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963