[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Berkeley db package really necessary for openldap??

To: ando@sys-net.it
Subject: Re: Berkeley db package really necessary for openldap??
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:48:47 -0700
Cc: <swalker@caspercollege.edu>, <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <64559.81.72.89.40.1081981542.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it>
References: <407D5C8A.6762.1D493CF@localhost> <64559.81.72.89.40.1081981542.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it>

At 03:25 PM 4/14/2004, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>If you use OpenLDAP 2.2 you need Berkeley 4.2.52; if you use
>OpenLDAP 2.1 you can live with 4.1.25, although 4.2.52 is
>recommended. 

For back-bdb, that is.  Also, be sure to check for Sleepycat
website for patches.

For back-ldbm, by design, supports a far wider range of DBMs
and versions there of.

- Kurt

References:
- Berkeley db package really necessary for openldap??
  - From: "Stewart Walker" <swalker@caspercollege.edu>
- Re: Berkeley db package really necessary for openldap??
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: MAC OS X clients and OpenLDAP
Next by Date: RE: Berkeley db package really necessary for openldap??
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread