[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: threading

To: Wout van Albada <wout@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: threading
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:48:34 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20040331081658.GA9384@mudshark.science.uva.nl>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0403300905210.2182-100000@kehillah.jewish.org.pl> <98824902.1080604387@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <20040331081658.GA9384@mudshark.science.uva.nl>

--On Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:16 AM +0200 Wout van Albada <wout@science.uva.nl> wrote:

On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:53:07PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

I had threading problems using RH9 and OpenLDAP.  I've found Solaris 8
threading to be extremely reliable.  I found Solaris 9 threading to
cause  massive problems.  I'm currently testing Debian.  So I suggest a
lot of  testing to see how the threads are handled in a particular OS.


Can you elaborate on the Solaris 9 threading problems? I've got
an OpenLDAP server running on Solaris 9 that needs to go live
in the near future.
Should I downgrade to Solaris 8 to avoid trouble?

It always depends on how you build your OL package. My issues came with SASL & GSSAPI binds. I always advocate doing stress testing of the server to see if there are issues to be aware of. I found OL to be unstable when combined with SASL/GSSAPI on Solaris 9.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- threading
  - From: Piotr Wadas <pwadas@jewish.org.pl>
- Re: threading
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: threading
  - From: Wout van Albada <wout@science.uva.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: ACL to permit access to some attributes
Next by Date: RE: ldapsearch to Active Directory
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread