[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: memory leak, or 'normal' behaviour?



--On Monday, March 15, 2004 3:10 PM +0100 Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it> wrote:

I tried 2.1 release code with simple bind (on Linux RH73)
and I don't see any significant growth (steady, after some
settlement) and no crash even without sleep.


Ando,

You might want to read his note closely -- He compiled against MIT Kerberos, which as I've stated at least 500 times already (well, maybe not quite *that* many), is full of memory leaks, and cannot handle threading at all. His result in relation to the server crashing is exactly what one *should* expect.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html