On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 10:17, Guenther Starnberger wrote: hi, > would specifying on of the backends as subordinate be a possible > solution? (according to the docs it seems so, i just played a little bit > around with this option, but wasn't able to get it working.) hmm.. the 1st subordinate query seems to succeed, but only proceeding queries fail. i guess the reason is a problem somewhere in the data (which doesn't pass the schemacheck yet). it works fine with a few testentries. cu /gst
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part