[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: sasl UID mapping

To: Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>
Subject: RE: sasl UID mapping
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:32:48 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: "'OpenLDAP list'" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <1073903633.1974.11.camel@localhost>
References: <013301c3d8a8$b1c2b9e0$1801a8c0@CELLO> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0401120119260.1416@fogarty.jakma.org> <1073903633.1974.11.camel@localhost>

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tony Earnshaw wrote:

> Advice: do *not* "upgrade" to Fedora (an inherently unstable and
> unreliable distro) from RH 7.3 (an inherently stable and reasonably
> reliable distro).

As an aside, the upgrade from 7.3 to FC1 worked fine.

> upgrade to SASL 2 and your Berkeley DB at the same time). Obviously
> you could upgrade to a stable RH version such as Enterprise Server
> 3, but that costs money.

Just to counter, in so far as OpenLDAP as concerned, FC1 and its
openldap packages seem perfectly stable here.
 
regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul@clubi.ie	paul@jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
	warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st
Fortune:
To avoid criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
		-- Elbert Hubbard

References:
- RE: sasl UID mapping
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- RE: sasl UID mapping
  - From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
- RE: sasl UID mapping
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>

Prev by Date: RE: Unconsumed replog causes slapd to shoot to 100% cpu?
Next by Date: RH/FC openldap stability (was RE: sasl UID mapping)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread