[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: o and c or dc?

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: o and c or dc?
From: Ace Suares <ace@suares.nl>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:35:43 -0400
Content-description: clearsigned data
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20040112151855.GA4100@brick.skills-1st.co.uk>
Organization: Ace Suares' Internet Consultancy
References: <20040112125939.AAA2F288196@mail.nlcom.nl> <20040112151855.GA4100@brick.skills-1st.co.uk>
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



> The main difference is in how easy it would be for a user to find your
> directory when they want it. 

Yes, if you are trying to implement something under ONE domain.

What do you suggest if you implement something with many domains, like a 
virtual domain hosting ISP ?

A_ce

website: http://www.suares.nl * http://www.qwikzite.nl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAAvcQy7boE8xtIjURAnn1AJ9y2BLD2ikM/407oS4YTeLY+Ijp4ACgl3tb
M0QYV8Oh7Adhd67J9Vh8Lhw=
=28SV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: o and c or dc?
  - From: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>

References:
- o and c or dc?
  - From: Geert Reijnders <reijnders@nlcom.nl>
- Re: o and c or dc?
  - From: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Compile openldap-2.0.25 on RedHat 9.0
Next by Date: RE: sasl UID mapping
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread