[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldap_add do_ldap_select ber_get_next ldap_read ldap_perror

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: ldap_add do_ldap_select ber_get_next ldap_read ldap_perror
From: Bob Gorman <bob@rsi.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:38:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <473552101.1073640212@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
References: <6.0.0.22.2.20040107152048.038a1e00@blip.rsi.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20040109114918.0373cec0@blip.rsi.com> <473552101.1073640212@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>

I notice that the current RedHat Fedora sports openldap-2.1.22-8. Do you think that version would be suitable, given that Stable is at openldap-2.1.25-20031217?

And thanks for the advice.

>>This running on a fully patch RedHat Linux 7.3 (i386) machine,
>>openldap-2.0.27-2.7.3, kernel-2.4.20-28.7.
>
>So far as I know, OpenLDAP-2.0 is no longer supported (It is not even available for download from the OpenLDAP website any more).  It is unforunate that Redhat continues to distribute that version of OpenLDAP. You'll have better luck (and a lot more support) if you investigate upgrading to a modern version of OpenLDAP.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ldap_add do_ldap_select ber_get_next ldap_read ldap_perror
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- ldap_add do_ldap_select ber_get_next ldap_read ldap_perror
  - From: Bob Gorman <bob@rsi.com>
- Re: ldap_add do_ldap_select ber_get_next ldap_read ldap_perror
  - From: Bob Gorman <bob@rsi.com>
- Re: ldap_add do_ldap_select ber_get_next ldap_read ldap_perror
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: AW: EVEN YET MORE Problem building openldap
Next by Date: RE: EVEN YET MORE Problem building openldap
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread