Re: sasl version mismatch: 2.1.15 vs 2.1.17

[Igor Brezac <igor@ipass.net>]

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Andreas wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:16:13PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> > As an example, BDB 4.1.17 changed its db_open API and added an additional
> > parameter in the middle of the parameter list. The API is completely
> > incompatible with what came before it, but the minor version is still the
> > same. The version number is > 4.0 so we should be happy with it, from a

DB format changes complicate matters even further.

>
> This is an example of a vendor (Sleepycat) who doesn't care about incompatible
> changes between minor release. Bad cat :)
>
> With this type of vendor one cannot rely on the soname (if it contains only
> the major version) at all. That's why I asked if cyrus-sasl had such behaviour
> in the past.
>

What vendor?  There is no such thing.  I am not sure where you are going
with this rant.  The software you are talking about is contributed to the
community for free.  Sure it is not perfect, but it is very good and
getting better.  You can make it better.  All all these projects welcome
quality contributions.

-- 
Igor