[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Question about v2.2.2beta dn checking



This sounds like a bug in 2.2. You should probably file an ITS report.

  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
  http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Allan E
Johannesen

> I was trying to feed a slapcat of 2.1.23 into slapadd of
> 2.2.2beta and the
> first entry gives an error:
>
> slapadd: line 16: database (dc=wpi,dc=edu) not configured to
> hold "dc=WPI,dc=EDU"
>
> This is the entry:
>
> dn: dc=WPI,dc=EDU
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: organization
> objectClass: dcObject
> dc: WPI
> o: WPI
> o: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
> description: A Technological University
> structuralObjectClass: organization
> entryUUID: 20fd6d98-9f25-1026-91c8-e528ea3c6a11
> creatorsName: cn=manager,ou=access,dc=wpi,dc=edu
> modifiersName: cn=manager,ou=access,dc=wpi,dc=edu
> createTimestamp: 20021208181800Z
> modifyTimestamp: 20021208181800Z
> entryCSN: 2002120818:18:00Z#0x00c0#0#0000
>
> I can't figure out how this differs from the example of a
> dcObject in section
> 5.1 of RFC2247.  I see that OpenLDAP 2.2 promised some
> tightening of the DN
> syntax, but the changes in the syntax have not been
> described, so I don't know
> what I've done wrong.
>
> Can someone please point out my error?
>
> Thanks.
>
>