[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: objectclass question

To: Andreas Gabriel <gabriel@hrz.uni-marburg.de>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: objectclass question
From: Peter Marschall <peter@adpm.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:08:02 +0200
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <3F7DA3C8.10701@hrz.uni-marburg.de>
Organization: ADPM
References: <3F7D4C08.7070908@wolfhill.cz> <200310031403.14015.peter@adpm.de> <3F7DA3C8.10701@hrz.uni-marburg.de>
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1

Hi,

On Friday 03 October 2003 18:28, Andreas Gabriel wrote:
> I have similar problems with porting LDAP databases from 2.0.x
> to 2.1.x. Since the schema check is realy armed in version 2.1.x,
> adding/porting of entries can only be solved by trial
> and error. It is quite difficult to find any documentation about these
> "new" restrictions.
>
> Do you know about a RFC or documentation paper?

Unfortunately I haven't. All I know about these new restrictions comes from 
following the OpenLDAP Software mailing list.

Peter

-- 
Peter Marschall
eMail: peter@adpm.de

References:
- objectclass question
  - From: Michal Gubik <mgubik@wolfhill.cz>
- Re: objectclass question
  - From: Peter Marschall <peter@adpm.de>
- Re: objectclass question
  - From: Andreas Gabriel <gabriel@hrz.uni-marburg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: objectclass question
Next by Date: Master LDAP and Small part replicated
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread