[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: does 'cn' have to be the same as in 'dn' ?

To: Grzegorz Filip <fliper_@poczta.onet.pl>
Subject: Re: does 'cn' have to be the same as in 'dn' ?
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:57:44 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <00d701c373ab$5b087a70$1e06a8c0@gringo>
References: <938BDCE792A46245AB40A7A87D7312DD022A9124@GAATLP19W.corp.aglrsc.com> <00d701c373ab$5b087a70$1e06a8c0@gringo>

Grzegorz Filip writes:
> but if i change 'cn' attribute like this
> 
> dn: cn=shelf,cn=case1,ou=netx,o=myorg,c=pl
> objectClass: netxShelf
> cn: other name
> 
> openldap doesnt want to accept it.

That's what the LDAP standard says.  You can _add_ cn: other name, but
you must keep cn: shelf.

> In prevoius version of openldap 2.0.23 it haven't any problems with it

OpenLDAP 2.1 conforms closer to the standard than 2.0 did.

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- RE: Front end to openldap?
  - From: "Lee Clemmer" <lclemmer@aglresources.com>
- does 'cn' have to be the same as in 'dn' ?
  - From: "Grzegorz Filip" <fliper_@poczta.onet.pl>

Prev by Date: RE: Front end to openldap?
Next by Date: How can I get rid of linewraps in output of ldapsearch?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread