[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Organizational structure - chart
Hello
There is one interesting documentation in this URL:
http://ldapman.org/articles/
In general, it´s better to use one differente approach than the
organizational structure, to permit more flexibility. For example, I´m
using a schema like this:
dc=domain
|
|
+----------------+-----------------+
| | |
ou=people ou=profiles ou=ITaccounts
|
|
+----------------+-----------------+
| | |
ou=employees ou=teachers ou=graduation
Another point: I tried to change the "people" OU to "funcionarios" (I´m
brazilian :-) ), but I had some headache with this because my Solaris 9
doesn´t works fine with a different model to the primary OUs (people,
profile, accounts, etc).
I hope this help you a little. :-)
Best regards
Dave Godbey
<dgodbey@hq.nasa.gov> To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Sent by: cc:
owner-openldap-software@O Subject: Organizational structure - chart
penLDAP.org
26/08/2003 12:39
Folks,
My apologies if this thread has occurred before, as I suspect it has. I
welcome redirection to a faq or other discussion.
What are the best ways to construct a schema/namespace that represent an
organizational structure? I have an org chart that has a collection of
offices that are organized as a tree to an arbitrary depth. eg:
Office of Operations
Director
555-1212
Director Business Mangagement 555-1313
Procurement
555-1213
Payroll
555-1214
Director Info Technology
555-1215
etc.
Is the semi-hierarchy with a flat base the best way to go? What other
schemes are viable?
Thanks,
Dave