[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: A little bit off topic question about jpegPhoto

To: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Subject: Re: A little bit off topic question about jpegPhoto
From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:35:43 +0200
Cc: Bruno Biedermann <biedermann@lyon.cemagref.fr>, openldap openldap <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <3F44B01D.5010909@stroeder.com>
References: <3F4473D1.6030601@lyon.cemagref.fr> <3F44A6F9.1020901@billy.demon.nl> <3F44B01D.5010909@stroeder.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Michael Ströder wrote:

Please avoid confusion!

I was indeed talking about the ldif encoding, I was under the impression that that was what was meant by the question - it's how I always think of the data. I never wrote that the ldif jpeg encoding included the word 'binary'!

Sorry for the confusion :-)

Tony

--
Tony Earnshaw

Looking backwards is always easy with hindsight

http://www.billy.demon.nl
Mail: tonni@billy.demon.nl

References:
- A little bit off topic question about jpegPhoto
  - From: Bruno Biedermann <biedermann@lyon.cemagref.fr>
- Re: A little bit off topic question about jpegPhoto
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
- Re: A little bit off topic question about jpegPhoto
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Password protection from admins
Next by Date: Re: Password protection from admins
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread