[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: Openldap vs. IBM Directory Server
Hello Lee,
I hope that you are well. If you find that OpenLDAP multi-master
replication is not suitable then you would have to look at the software
from Sun, they have 4 way multi-master replication available on their
software (Sun ONE Directory Server) which is the closed to this that you
can get for a true ldap server so to say.
Cheers,
Aly.
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 14:09, Smits.Dolf wrote:
> Hello Lee,
>
> I don't have much experience with openLdap, but some little with IBM
> secureway.
>
> One thing I noticed is that is has its own idea's of interpreting LDAP
> standards.
> I once ported an application (IBM accessmanager) to Siemens Directory, and I
> had a lot of problems due to the generalizedTime syntax, which is incorrect
> in IBM. (timestamps look like 20030819230745.Z, beware of the point!)
>
> Other than that, You immediatly recognize the UMICH implementation behind
> it, as it still is based heavily on that.
>
> Besides that, it is not a real ldapserver, but an ldap frontend to the DB2
> database (which you have to buy!) so the free of IBM is different to the
> free of IBM.
>
> Just my opinion,
>
> Regards, Dolf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee [mailto:lee_hoffman@brown.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 21:10
> To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: Openldap vs. IBM Directory Server
>
>
> Hey All,
> We are evaluating a switch to IBM Directory Server from our current
> openldap cluster due to openldap's lack of (or should i say buggy)
> multimaster support.
>
> I wanted to get an impression from users of this list that have
> experience with both servers, and what if any advantages OpenLdap has
> over IBM's Directory Server (which is also free).
>
> Thanks,
> Lee
--
Aly S.P Dharshi
aly.dharshi@uleth.ca
Southern Alberta Digital Library Project
"A good speech is like a good dress
that's short enough to be interesting
and long enough to cover the subject"