[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Berkley DB Vs ... ? (was Re: Compilation Errors)

To: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Subject: Berkley DB Vs ... ? (was Re: Compilation Errors)
From: "E. M. Recio" <erecio@polywog.navpoint.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:02:14 -0400
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <HBF.20030813vclp@bombur.uio.no>
Organization: Polywog Systems ( http://polywog.navpoint.com )
References: <3F3A3A41.7060402@polywog.navpoint.com> <HBF.20030813vclp@bombur.uio.no>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:

Yes.  You said that LDBM's API is GDBM, but you must also say that LDBM
should be used.  Maybe that's a bug, and --with-ldbm-api should warn if
--enable-ldbm is not given.

Okay, so now the question is... which is better. If the default is berkley, does that mean that the berkeley one is faster?

-Elmo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Berkley DB Vs ... ? (was Re: Compilation Errors)
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

References:
- Compilation Errors
  - From: "E. M. Recio" <erecio@polywog.navpoint.com>
- Re: Compilation Errors
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: Re: still unclear on error 69
Next by Date: Re: still unclear on error 69
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread