[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: still unclear on error 69

To: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Subject: Re: still unclear on error 69
From: Dustin Doris <openldap@mail.doris.cc>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:56:52 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Jon Roberts <jon@mentata.com>, OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <3F3A3D3B.5070609@billy.demon.nl>
References: <3F33DB08.6000600@mentata.com> <3F340672.5060705@billy.demon.nl> <3F345565.80003@mentata.com> <3F34E9E2.7040707@billy.demon.nl> <3F35B383.9030200@mentata.com> <3F36299F.5010109@billy.demon.nl> <3F37DE83.1020609@mentata.com> <20030813080911.N7176@mail.doris.cc> <3F3A3D3B.5070609@billy.demon.nl>

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:

> Dustin Doris wrote:
>
> > I believe that you can only have one structural object class.  Must have
> > one, can't have two.
>
> Twaddle.
>
> Tony
>

Drivel

> --
> Tony Earnshaw
>
> Looking backwards is always easy with hindsight
>
> http://www.billy.demon.nl
> Mail: tonni@billy.demon.nl
>

References:
- still unclear on error 69
  - From: Jon Roberts <jon@mentata.com>
- Re: still unclear on error 69
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
- Re: still unclear on error 69
  - From: Jon Roberts <jon@mentata.com>
- Re: still unclear on error 69
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
- Re: still unclear on error 69
  - From: Jon Roberts <jon@mentata.com>
- Re: still unclear on error 69
  - From: Jon Roberts <jon@mentata.com>
- Re: still unclear on error 69
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Critical Path IMS and OpenLDAP
Next by Date: TLS with MacOS 10.2 OpenLDAP server
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread