[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: master for one part, slave for another part of the tree

To: Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@electrosilk.net>
Subject: Re: master for one part, slave for another part of the tree
From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:32:39 -0300
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <083401c35c70$1ce88980$06281fcb@develop02>
References: <20030806142538.GG8586@conectiva.com.br> <20030806222409.GV8586@conectiva.com.br> <083401c35c70$1ce88980$06281fcb@develop02>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:11:48AM +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> works, but we get occasional non-specific internal errors related to bdb.

How serius? Do you need to run db_recover?

References:
- master for one part, slave for another part of the tree
  - From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: master for one part, slave for another part of the tree
  - From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: master for one part, slave for another part of the tree
  - From: "Jeremy Ardley" <jeremy@electrosilk.net>

Prev by Date: Re: master for one part, slave for another part of the tree
Next by Date: Re: OpenLDAP with GSSAPI problem
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread