No, I'm still waiting.
I'd like to know what (if any) advantages OpenLDAP offers for using the uniqueMember optional UID, or whether groupOfNames is sufficient.
PJDM
--
Peter Mayne
Technology Consultant
Spherion Technology Solutions
Level 1, 243 Northbourne Avenue, Lyneham, ACT, 2602
T: 61 2 62689727 F: 61 2 62689777
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Rudd [mailto:eddie@omegaware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2003 9:44 AM
> To: Mayne, Peter
> Cc: 'openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org'
> Subject: Re: groupOfNames vs groupOfUniqueNames
>
>
> Did you ever find an answer to this question??
> I have been pondering the same question for a while and
> haven't had luck
> locating an answer.
>
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 21:12, Mayne, Peter wrote:
> > After some investigation, I'm still somewhat unclear on the choice
> > between groupOfNames with the member attribute, and
> groupOfUniqueNames
> > with the uniqueMember attribute
> >
> > Given that we're using currently planning to use the uid
> attribute of
> > inetOrgPerson to store usernames, I'm not sure how this
> relates to the
> > optional UID component of uniqueMember's syntax.
> >
> > Can someone provide some clarity?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > PJDM
> > --
> > Peter Mayne
> > Technology Consultant
> > Spherion Technology Solutions
> > Level 1, 243 Northbourne Avenue, Lyneham, ACT, 2602
> > T: 61 2 62689727 F: 61 2 62689777
> >
> > The information contained in this email and any attachments to it:
> >
> > (a) may be confidential and if you are not the intended
> recipient, any interference with,
> > use, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised
> and prohibited; and
> >
> > (b) may contain personal information of the recipient
> and/or the sender as defined
> > under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Consent is hereby given
> by the recipient(s) to
> > collect, hold and use such information and any personal
> information contained in a
> > response to this email, for any reasonable purpose in the
> ordinary course of
> > Spherion's
> > business, including forwarding this email internally or
> disclosing it to a third party. All
> > personal information collected by Spherion will be handled
> in accordance with
> > Spherion's Privacy Policy. If you have received this email
> in error, please notify the
> > sender and delete it.
> >
> > (c) you agree not to employ or arrange employment for any
> candidate(s) supplied in
> > this email and any attachments without first entering into
> a contractual agreement with
> > Spherion. You further agree not to divulge any information
> contained in this document
> > to any person(s) or entities without the express permission
> of Spherion.
> --
> Edward Rudd <eddie@omegaware.com>
> Home Page <http://urkle.drip.ws/>
>
The information contained in this email and any attachments to it: (a) may be confidential and if you are not the intended recipient, any interference with, use, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited; and (b) may contain personal information of the recipient and/or the sender as defined under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Consent is hereby given by the recipient(s) to collect, hold and use such information and any personal information contained in a response to this email, for any reasonable purpose in the ordinary course of Spherion's business, including forwarding this email internally or disclosing it to a third party. All personal information collected by Spherion will be handled in accordance with Spherion's Privacy Policy. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it. (c) you agree not to employ or arrange employment for any candidate(s) supplied in this email and any attachments without first entering into a contractual agreement with Spherion. You further agree not to divulge any information contained in this document to any person(s) or entities without the express permission of Spherion.