[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
From: U.Drolshagen@t-online.de (Ulrich Drolshagen)
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:52:21 +0200
Cc: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
In-reply-to: <3F0945A4.2090405@stroeder.com>
References: <02cc01c34468$2760d1d0$0200000a@tkodog.noip.com> <3F0945A4.2090405@stroeder.com>
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

Am Montag, 7. Juli 2003 12:04 schrieb Michael Ströder:
> Joe Wong wrote:
> > I see that most of the Linux distro is still including openldap 2.0.x
>
> They are not up to date.
AFAIK 2.1 doesn't support crypt-passwords anymore. Is that right?

greetings

Ulrich

-- 
Ulrich Drolshagen	Tel.  +49-581-38 900 68 dr@bbs1-uelzen.de
Ahornweg 30		Fax  +49-581-38 900 69 drolshag@uni-lueneburg.de
29525 Uelzen		Mobil +49-172-4048973

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

References:
- 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
  - From: "Joe Wong" <joewong@tkodog.no-ip.com>
- Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: ldap_add: Strong(er) authentication required
Next by Date: Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread