[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: question with slapadd and slapindex

To: ?? <demoboy@elong.com>
Subject: Re: question with slapadd and slapindex
From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:44:49 -0300
Cc: "openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20030618081336.1EC7C3F2F@smtp.elong.com>
References: <20030618081336.1EC7C3F2F@smtp.elong.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:15:03PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> but this process is too slowly, almost cost an hour!
> in ldif file ,about 40,000 entries!
> i run over red hat 7.2 with openldap 2.1.19 and Berkeley DB 4.1
> also hardware is not too bad!
> Can anybody else tell me some method to improve this process!

You need to tune your DB_CONFIG parameters. Take a look at some
examples here: https://moin.conectiva.com.br/openldap

I also posted an answer to this very same mailing list yesterday, take
a look at the archives.

References:
- question with slapadd and slapindex
  - From: "周" <demoboy@elong.com>

Prev by Date: Unexpected data in PDU
Next by Date: Re: performance difference in ldapsearch?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread