[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: postfix+ldap

To: Diego Thomas <diego@pfcnetwork.com.br>
Subject: Re: postfix+ldap
From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Date: 13 May 2003 21:30:20 +0200
Cc: OpenLDAP-Software@OpenLDAP.org, Markus Schabel <markus.schabel@tgm.ac.at>, paulo@pfcnetwork.com.br
In-reply-to: <00e801c31962$70279ec0$042fa8c0@diego>
Organization:
References: <00b701c3195b$06bb6a90$042fa8c0@diego> <3EC106A7.2010409@tgm.ac.at> <00e801c31962$70279ec0$042fa8c0@diego>

tir, 13.05.2003 kl. 17.15 skrev Diego Thomas:

> Here i have more than 300 acounts and alot of mails/minute..
> 
> the ldap server is running in localhost..
> i tryed alot of things at syslog and ldap...
> 
> it's not supporting the traffic..

There are a lot of Openldap versions in circulation, v2 from 2.0.9 to
the present 2.1.19.My own experience is, that it didn't get stable under
heavy load until 2.1.12. I'll have a lot of 2.0.x people contradicting
this, but as I said, that's my experience. I'm running 2.1.18/BDB 4.1.24
and it is utterly stable for small to medium sites - with proper
indexing and default DB settings.

Best,

Tony

-- 
Tony Earnshaw

There's none so daft as them as will not learn.

http://www.billy.demon.nl
Mail: tonni@billy.demon.nl

References:
- postfix+ldap
  - From: "Diego Thomas" <diego@pfcnetwork.com.br>
- Re: postfix+ldap
  - From: Markus Schabel <markus.schabel@tgm.ac.at>
- Re: postfix+ldap
  - From: "Diego Thomas" <diego@pfcnetwork.com.br>

Prev by Date: RE: Indexing performance
Next by Date: Re: question about openldap as a server
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread