[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: test of SASL DIGEST-MD5 mechanism



also, your regexp is resetting the auth dn which contains cn=u00997 to a dn in your db that starts out as uid=u00997.
the dn your trying to map to from your ldif example doesnt have the dn that contains 'u00997'.  try setting your -U parameter to Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: Cindy Wang [mailto:cwang@KiNETWORKS.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 6:32 PM
To: Chapman, Kyle
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: test of SASL DIGEST-MD5 mechanism


Thanks, Chapman for pointing out the typo to me. I corrected the typo, 
but got the same error message. Any other comments? Thanks.

Cindy

Chapman, Kyle wrote:

>if you look at your regexp, cn=enigeer <> cn=engineer
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cindy Wang [mailto:cwang@KiNETWORKS.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 5:51 PM
>To: Chapman, Kyle
>Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
>Subject: Re: test of SASL DIGEST-MD5 mechanism
>
>
>I don't think it is a typo.  The sasl-regexp directive is used to map 
>authentication identities to LDAP entries.
>
>Cindy
>
>Chapman, Kyle wrote:
>
>  
>
>>is this a typo from your log?
>>"uid=$1,cn=enigneer,dc=rtp,dc=KiNETWORKS,dc=com"
>>
>>your dn is:
>>dn: cn=Andrew,cn=engineer,dc=rtp,dc=KiNETWORKS,dc=com
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Cindy Wang [mailto:cwang@kinetworks.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:17 PM
>>To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
>>Subject: test of SASL DIGEST-MD5 mechanism
>>
>>
>>Hi:
>>
>>I am trying to set up some simple tests of SASL  DIGEST-MD 5 mechanism 
>>running openldap.2.1.16 with SASL on Solaris 5.7.  But when I did the 
>>search, I got the following message:
>>
>>ldapsearch -Y DIGEST-MD5 -U u00997 -b 'dc=rtp,dc=KiNETWORKS,dc=com' 
>>'cn=Andrew'
>>SASL/DIGEST-MD5 authentication started
>>Please enter your password:
>>ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Internal (implementation specific) error
>>(80)
>>       additional info: SASL(-13): user not found: no secret in
>>database
>>
>>I have an entry in the Directory as the following:
>>
>># Andrew, engineer, rtp.KiNETWORKS.com
>>dn: cn=Andrew,cn=engineer,dc=rtp,dc=KiNETWORKS,dc=com
>>objectClass: person
>>objectClass: inetOrgPerson
>>cn: Andrew
>>sn: Findlay
>>uid: u00997
>>userPassword:: c2VjcmV0
>>
>>================== slapd.conf ====================
>>password-hash   {CLEARTEXT}
>>sasl-regexp
>>       uid=(.*),cn=rtp.KiNETWORKS.com,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth
>>       uid=$1,cn=enigneer,dc=rtp,dc=KiNETWORKS,dc=com
>>================================================
>>
>>Could anyone tell if anything is wrong with the above sasl-regexp
>>mapping?
>>I even ran the debugger and found that in servers/slapd/saslauthz.c, at 
>>line
>>302, the function call regexec( ) didn't return a 0 with the above 
>>sasl-regexp.
>>And the following is in the "reg" structure during the debugging:
>>*reg = {
>>   sr_match     = 0x83e3fd8 
>>"uid=(.*),cn=rtp.KiNETWORKS.com,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth"
>>   sr_replace   = 0x83a67b8 
>>"uid=$1,cn=enigneer,dc=rtp,dc=KiNETWORKS,dc=com"
>>   sr_workspace = {
>>       re_nsub   = 1U
>>       re_comp   = 0x83baba8
>>       re_cflags = 5
>>       re_erroff = 0
>>       re_len    = 108U
>>       re_sc     = 0x83bac30
>>   }
>>   sr_strings   = (
>>{
>>       rm_sp = 0x656e6973 "<bad address 0x656e6973>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x61437373 "<bad address 0x61437373>"
>>       rm_so = 1869047156
>>       rm_eo = 606108018
>>       rm_ss = 1918984992
>>       rm_es = 1701013836
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x2065736e "<bad address 0x2065736e>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x65642024 "<bad address 0x65642024>"
>>       rm_so = 1953653104
>>       rm_eo = 1953391981
>>       rm_ss = 1651340622
>>       rm_es = 606106213
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x69640920 "<bad address 0x69640920>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x616c7073 "<bad address 0x616c7073>"
>>       rm_so = 1835093625
>>       rm_eo = 539238501
>>       rm_ss = 1819307365
>>       rm_es = 1701149039
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x626d754e "<bad address 0x626d754e>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x24207265 "<bad address 0x24207265>"
>>       rm_so = 1886217504
>>       rm_eo = 1702457196
>>       rm_ss = 1886999653
>>       rm_es = 539238501
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x65766967 "<bad address 0x65766967>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x6d614e6e "<bad address 0x6d614e6e>"
>>       rm_so = 539238501
>>       rm_eo = 1836017673
>>       rm_ss = 1869107301
>>       rm_es = 606102894
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x6d6f6820 "<bad address 0x6d6f6820>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x736f5065 "<bad address 0x736f5065>"
>>       rm_so = 1097621876
>>       rm_eo = 1701995620
>>       rm_ss = 606106483
>>       rm_es = 1768843552
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x6c616974 "<bad address 0x6c616974>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x20242073 "<bad address 0x20242073>"
>>       rm_so = 1734701162
>>       rm_eo = 1953458256
>>       rm_ss = 539238511
>>       rm_es = 1650551817
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x64656c65 "<bad address 0x64656c65>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x20495255 "<bad address 0x20495255>"
>>       rm_so = 1634541604
>>       rm_eo = 606104681
>>       rm_ss = 1851878688
>>       rm_es = 1919248225
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x6d202420 "<bad address 0x6d202420>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x6c69626f "<bad address 0x6c69626f>"
>>       rm_so = 539238501
>>       rm_eo = 539238511
>>       rm_ss = 1701273968
>>       rm_es = 539238514
>>   }{
>>       rm_sp = 0x6f687009 "<bad address 0x6f687009>"
>>       rm_ep = 0x24206f74 "<bad address 0x24206f74>"
>>       rm_so = 1869574688
>>       rm_eo = 1836404333
>>       rm_ss = 544367970
>>       rm_es = 1702043684
>>   }
>>)
>>   sr_offset    = (-2, 4, 46, -1, 1919251317, 1953654083, 1667851881, 
>>543519841, 2013863972, 1966092341, 1970366830, 1701071205)
>>}
>>
>>
>>
>>================== log information for the slapd
>>==========================
>>==slap_sasl2dn: Converted SASL name to <nothing>
>>SASL Canonicalize [conn=0]: authcDN="uid=u00997,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth"
>>SASL Canonicalize [conn=0]: authzid="u00997"
>>SASL [conn=0] Failure: no secret in database
>>send_ldap_result: conn=0 op=1 p=3
>>send_ldap_result: err=80 matched="" text="SASL(-13): user not found: no 
>>secret in database"
>>send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=97 err=80
>>ber_flush: 62 bytes to sd 11
>> 0000:  30 3c 02 01 02 61 37 0a  01 50 04 00 04 30 53 41   
>>0<...a7..P...0SA 
>> 0010:  53 4c 28 2d 31 33 29 3a  20 75 73 65 72 20 6e 6f   SL(-13): 
>>user no 
>> 0020:  74 20 66 6f 75 6e 64 3a  20 6e 6f 20 73 65 63 72   t found: no 
>>secr 
>> 0030:  65 74 20 69 6e 20 64 61  74 61 62 61 73 65         et in 
>>database   
>>ldap_write: want=62, written=62
>> 0000:  30 3c 02 01 02 61 37 0a  01 50 04 00 04 30 53 41   
>>0<...a7..P...0SA 
>> 0010:  53 4c 28 2d 31 33 29 3a  20 75 73 65 72 20 6e 6f   SL(-13): 
>>user no 
>> 0020:  74 20 66 6f 75 6e 64 3a  20 6e 6f 20 73 65 63 72   t found: no 
>>secr 
>> 0030:  65 74 20 69 6e 20 64 61  74 61 62 61 73 65         et in 
>>database   
>>conn=0 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=80 text=SASL(-13): user not found: no 
>>secret in database
>><== slap_sasl_bind: rc=80
>>daemon: select: listen=7 active_threads=1 tvp=NULL
>>daemon: activity on 1 descriptors
>>daemon: activity on: 11r
>>daemon: read activity on 11
>>connection_get(11)
>>connection_get(11): got connid=0
>>connection_read(11): checking for input on id=0
>>ber_get_next
>>ldap_read: want=9, got=0
>>
>>ber_get_next on fd 11 failed errno=0 (Error 0)
>>connection_read(11): input error=-2 id=0, closing.
>>connection_closing: readying conn=0 sd=11 for close
>>connection_close: conn=0 sd=11
>>daemon: removing 11
>>conn=0 fd=11 closed
>>daemon: select: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL
>>daemon: activity on 1 descriptors
>>daemon: select: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL
>>
>>======================================================================
>>
>>Thanks very much for your help.
>>
>>Cindy Wang
>>Software Product Engineer
>>KiNETWORKS
>>NOTICE: This E-mail may contain confidential information. If you are not
>>the addressee or the intended recipient please do not read this E-mail
>>and please immediately delete this e-mail message and any attachments
>>    
>>
>>from your workstation or network mail system. If you are the addressee
>  
>
>>or the intended recipient and you save or print a copy of this E-mail,
>>please place it in an appropriate file, depending on whether
>>confidential information is contained in the message.
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>