[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Different CN's for DN and CN.

To: OpenLDAP Software List <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Different CN's for DN and CN.
From: Dave Horsfall <daveh@ci.com.au>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:14:43 +1100 (EST)
Archive: No
In-reply-to: <1047907442.1494.83.camel@pc2962>
References: <1047898410.1376.32.camel@pc2962> <3E75BA73.3040003@int-evry.fr> <1047907442.1494.83.camel@pc2962>

On Tue, 17 Mar 2003, Andrew McCall wrote:

> It looks like I have a load of perl-coding so I can clear this up :(

If it's any help, I have a Perl script that looks for this and other
anomalies; it doesn't correct them, but reports them.  It takes a slapcat
file as input (I can't use Net::LDAP because it croaks in the face of
these errors).

It currently looks for:

  Missing RDN
  Multiple RDNs
  Mismatched RDN
  Missing superior for objectClass
  Orphan

-- 
Dave Horsfall  DTM  VK2KFU  daveh@ci.com.au  Ph: +61 2 9906-7866  Fx: 9906-1556
Corinthian Engineering, Level 1, 401 Pacific Hwy, Artarmon, NSW 2064, Australia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Different CN's for DN and CN.
  - From: Andrew McCall <it.andrew.mccall@oldham.gov.uk>
- Re: Different CN's for DN and CN.
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

References:
- Different CN's for DN and CN.
  - From: Andrew McCall <it.andrew.mccall@oldham.gov.uk>
- Re: Different CN's for DN and CN.
  - From: Jehan PROCACCIA <Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr>
- Re: Different CN's for DN and CN.
  - From: Andrew McCall <it.andrew.mccall@oldham.gov.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Different CN's for DN and CN.
Next by Date: Open ldap with a parent server?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread