[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Very slow search speed
Please provide your freeradius ldap related configuration. In particular
show filter and groupmembership_filter parameters.
-Igor
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Paweena Charoentham wrote:
> I want to use OpenLDAP with FreeRadius but after some tests I have a big problem with performance.
>
>
>
> For 1 client with continuously search using ldapsearch command the throughput rate is only 3-4 requests/second. (There are about 600,000 entries on ldap) I also test by put only 10,000 entries on ldap but the throughput rate is not different much.
>
>
>
> When I increase the number of simultaneous client continuously send requests to ldap. The throughput rate sharply decreases. With 16 simultaneous clients, the throughput rate is 0.2 request/second. Over 16 clients, OpenLDAP will saturate.
>
>
>
> I also write my own client program using OpenLDAP library to measure which part drop the performance down. My client open connection to ldap, do 2 searches and then close the connection. After run it, I found that for each search request, 66% of time spends on ldap_simple_bind_s function. Each ldap_search_ext_s takes 16% and 2% for others.
>
>
>
> On this test I use OpenLDAP-2.0.27 on RedHat 7.3 machine, Intel Xeon 2 GHz dual CPU with 2 GB RAM, Adaptec SCSI host adapter (aic7899) on RAID5, BROADCOM NetXtreme BCM5702X Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (on board). Number of the data in the ldap is about 600,000 entries.
>
>
>
> The following is some tuning I made on slapd.conf
>
>
>
> threads 32
>
> concurrency 27
>
> loglevel 4
>
>
>
> # Indices to maintain
>
> index objectClass eq
>
> index products eq
>
> index uid eq
>
> index username,realm eq
>
> index mail eq
>
> index domain eq
>
>
>
> cachesize 1000000
>
> dbcachesize 1000000000
>
>
>
> (I also do this test on OpenLDAP-2.1.12 and the throughput rate is as same as 2.0.27)
>
>
>
> While the test is running, the ldap server load is only about 2 and there is some physical memory left. But I wonder why the number of threads is always being 9? Why does it not increase to share works? Am I do something wrong? Or what is the right way to tune OpenLDAP to gain an acceptable performance with this enormous data? Anyone help me please…
>
>
>
> Paweena Charoentham
>
--
Igor