Package 2.1.14 -> Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13

[Jehan PROCACCIA <Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr>]

Openldap changes every days ...

a 2.1.14 package is available at my usual place:
http://www.int-evry.fr/mci/user/procacci/SRPMS/ -> openldap-2.1.14-2 , 
binaries are for RH 8.0, but src RPM is there too !.

%changelog

* Mon Mar 03 2003 Jehan Procaccia <jehan.procaccia@int-evry.fr> 2.1.14-1 
(-1 should be -2!)
- upgraded to 2.1.14
- removed patch for schema-check (already patched in 2.1.14 !)
- removed make test openldap build to accelerate rpmbuild


Jehan PROCACCIA wrote:
> Great ! it finally work :-)
>
> I've just compiled RPMS under RH 8.0 , I put them + source RPM in :
> http://www.int-evry.fr/mci/user/procacci/SRPMS/ -> openldap-2.1.13-3
> Thanks to Frank Swasey an openldap developpers it now includes the patch 
> about schema checking problem with attributes in rdn not present in 
> entry which caused a seg fault message !
>
> %changelog
>
> * Thu Feb 28 2003 Jehan Procaccia <jehan.procaccia@int-evry.fr> 2.1.13-3
> - from Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu> 2.1.12-uvm2.8.0:
> - sleepycat bdb 4.1.25 plus locking patch
> - add patch for schema-check
> - add patch for slapd lock-release in group acl processing
> - add patch for slapcat a subtree
> - add make test to openldap build
>
> Now insteed of seg fault it says:
>
> <= str2entry(cn=brou,ou=People,dc=enstb,dc=fr) -> 0x823aba0
> ...
> slapadd: dn="cn=brou,ou=People,dc=enstb,dc=fr" (line=19): (16) value of 
> naming attribute 'cn' is not present in entry
>
> ldif beeing:
>
> dn: cn=brou,ou=People,dc=enstb,dc=fr
> cn: Jean Brou
> sn: Brou
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: person
> objectClass: inetOrgPerson
> mail: Jean.Brou@enstb.fr
> givenName: Jean
>
> now if I put in the ldif:
> sn=brou,ou=People,dc=enstb,dc=fr
>
> <= index_entry_add( 3, "sn=brou,ou=People,dc=enstb,dc=fr" ) success
> :-)
>
> However the error message could be even more explicit :
> "(16) value of naming attribute 'cn' is not present in entry" + add " or 
> does not have the same value in the entry than in the dn ..." which was 
> my case !.
>
> By the way, why this new contraint ? in respect to LDAP RFCs ?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> Frank Swasey wrote:
>
> > Today at 6:30pm, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > I'm rebuilding now with that patch applied to schema_check.c.
> > > >
> > > > I am curious about what part of the schema I am violating that was 
> > > > legal
> > > > (or possibly just not checked) in 2.1.12.  But, time will tell -- slow
> > > > machine takes a while to build the RPM :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > OpenLDAP never checked that the attributeTypes and values used
> > > in the RDN were actually present in the entry.  This was added
> > > in 2.1.13 (maybe it was not adequately advertised ...).
> > >
> > > For details, you may follow the thread originated by ITS#2243.
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, my ldif file isn't supposed to have any entries that violate 
> > that.... but looking at that one entry.... Drat!  more crud to go 
> > fix... :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >   F



--
Jehan Procaccia 			| Ingenieur Systemes & Reseaux
Institut National des Telecommunications| Tel : +33 (0) 160764436
MCI, Moyens Communs Informatiques  | Mail: Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr
9 rue Charles Fourier 91011 Evry France | Fax : +33 (0) 160764321