[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Anonymously binding despite '-U ....' to ldapsearch

To: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
Subject: Re: Anonymously binding despite '-U ....' to ldapsearch
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:07:37 -0500
Cc: "'Turbo Fredriksson'" <turbo@bayour.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <003c01c2ddc2$f6338280$0e01a8c0@CELLO>
References: <87fzqbj66a.fsf@papadoc.bayour.com> <003c01c2ddc2$f6338280$0e01a8c0@CELLO>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

Err, sorry for my earlier comment about the list, apparently I'm having
trouble reading at the moment.  I was thinking I sent that post out the
other day when the website was having problems, of course, I may be
misremembering when that was too.  In any case it does appear that there
was near an 8 hour turnaround lag time for the list which seems kind of
long...

	Stephen

Attachment: pgpfQbW6tojh7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: Anonymously binding despite '-U ....' to ldapsearch
  - From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>
- RE: Anonymously binding despite '-U ....' to ldapsearch
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Anonymously binding despite '-U ....' to ldapsearch
Next by Date: Re: RDBMS and LDAP wars
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread