[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
objectClasses and migrating to 2.1.x
I see lots of examples in the documentation where entries have a full swag
of objectClass attributes e.g.
sn: Jensen
cn: Babs Jensen
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
Yet in our 2.0.25 directory, we merely have e.g.:
sn: Fred
cn: Fred Nerk
objectClass: person
i.e. without the "top". There are in fact many such entries without "top"
(and I was not around when they were made). I note that "GQ" insists upon
having "top" etc.
I suspect this will cause trouble when migrating to 2.1.x, right?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM VK2KFU daveh@ci.com.au Ph: +61 2 9906-7866 Fx: 9906-1556
Corinthian Engineering, Level 1, 401 Pacific Hwy, Artarmon, NSW 2064, Australia