Oddly, I frequently use the same reason to argue for putting data in
ldap rather than oracle or mysql. The fact that ldap is based on open
standards while rdbms aren't (last I took the time to look, anyway)
seems to me to weigh heavily in ldap's favor.
Best,
Andrew
-- On Sep 27, 4:52pm, "Jesse W. Asher" wrote:
Subject: Re: Mysql as a backend for LDAP
Yes, but you don't want to. Why does everyone keep thinking using an
RDBMS as a backend to LDAP is a good idea? And mysql no less... I
might be able to understand Oracle, DB2, etc... If you don't understand
why this is a terrible idea please go read the FAQ entry about this.
Why? Because having the data in a relational backend allows one to use
that same data for many other things. My philosophy is to do my best to
have as few data sources as possible and to minimize the number of
places that data must be maintained. Having this data in a database
has a LOT of advantages.
-- End of excerpt from "Jesse W. Asher" --