Re: Follow up: 2.1.4, solaris 8, fails to start

["Giovanni Navarrette" <gio@uslink.net>]

I'm pretty sure you've already done this..., but did you add an entry in
your /etc/hosts.allow for slapd?

root@ldapsrv-1:~# grep slapd /etc/hosts.allow
slapd: 127.0.0.1,XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX (real IP there)
root@ldapsrv-1:~#

I had that same problem when I compiled with wrapper support. Beat my head
on that problem for 2 hours before it struck me. Without the slapd entry in
hosts.allow, the 'make test' wont even work. Gl hf:)

-
-------------------------------------------------------
Giovanni Navarrette
USLink Internet Systems Administrator
e-Mail -- gio@uslink.net



----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Diederich" <andrew@NETdelivery.com>
To: "openLDAP (E-mail)" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: Follow up: 2.1.4, solaris 8, fails to start


> Things still build, but the tests don't work.  This time around,
> server/slapd/tools/slapadd somehow didn't build.  Since --enable-slapd
> defaults to yes, does anyone know offhand what ./configure option would
> control that being built?
>
> I'm rebuilding again with just ./configure, to see if something went
> terribly wrong last time.  (Well, obviously something did go wrong . . .)
>
> --
> Andrew Diederich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Diederich [mailto:andrew@NETdelivery.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:17
> To: 'openLDAP (E-mail)'
> Cc: 'igor@ipass.net'
> Subject: RE: Follow up: 2.1.4, solaris 8, fails to start
>
>
> I'm trying to build again, this time dropping the ldbm stuff.  Because I
> can't get any worse right now, I'm also
trying --with-tls --enable-wrappers.
> (I already put tcp wrappers and openssl on the box).  We'll see how that
> goes.
>
> --
> Andrew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Brezac [mailto:igor@ipass.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:12
> To: Andrew Diederich
> Cc: openLDAP (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Follow up: 2.1.4, solaris 8, fails to start
>
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Andrew Diederich wrote:
>
> > So far:
> >
> > I've been running the berkeley db tests all night, and they haven't
found
> > any issues yet.  So, I'm guessing that it wasn't a bad berekely build.
> >
> > Looking through my notes, I've had less success with the tests after
> > --enable-ldbm -with-ldbm-api=berkeley.  I see that ldbm isn't on by
> default
> > with configure, but bdb (Berkeley DB backend) is.  I don't really
> understand
> > the difference.
> >
> > In my openldap 1.2.7 box, I have a "database ldbm" line.  In my initial
> > configuring and building of 2.1.[4|5], I have a database bdb line
instead.
> > What's the difference to me, especially if I go and make berkeley the
ldbm
> > api?
> >
>
> bdb is a new and recommended backend type.  'make test' seems to want
> ldbm.  If you are not going to use ldbm backend type, you can remove it
> from the build.
>
> Openldap 2.1.5 and both berkeley 4.0.14 and 4.1.24 build fine on Solaris 8
> and 9 (Sparc).  I use gcc 2.95.3.  Unfortunately, I do not know why you
> are not able to succefully build the latest version of openldap.  :(
>
> --
> Igor
>