[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Suggest slapd loglevel

To: Caylan Van Larson <caylan@cs.und.edu>
Subject: Re: Suggest slapd loglevel
From: Peter Marschall <peter.marschall@mayn.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:06:53 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131722360.9764-100000@penguin-38.cs.und.nodak.edu>
Organization: MPN
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131722360.9764-100000@penguin-38.cs.und.nodak.edu>

Hi,

On Saturday 14 September 2002 00:26, you wrote:
> WHAT!!!
>
> Please now someone explain to me how the bleeping versions are laid out?
> I wanted the latest 2.0 branch and settled for 2.0.9 (largest digit..?)
> How wrong I was, why is the naming so weird on there? There must be some
> convention that I do not know of.

Ever thought about reading http://www.openldap.org/software/download/ ?
It's only one click away from the main page of the OpenLDAP web site.

Yours
PEter
-- 
Peter Marschall     |   eMail: peter.marschall@mayn.de
Scheffelstraße 15   |          peter.marschall@is-energy.de
97072 Würzburg      |   Tel:   0931/14721
PGP:  D7 FF 20 FE E6 6B 31 74  D1 10 88 E0 3C FE 28 35

References:
- Re: Suggest slapd loglevel
  - From: Caylan Van Larson <caylan@cs.und.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Suggest slapd loglevel
Next by Date: Re: Is order important? Was: samba and openldap configuration
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread