lør, 2002-08-24 kl. 16:49 skrev Kurt D. Zeilenga: > At 06:58 PM 2002-08-23, jimd@siu.edu wrote: > >I wholeheartedly agree! An "OperationalChanges" document should be > >supplied with each OpenLDAP release that lists/details/points out all of > >the significant/important changes in operational characteristics and/or > >requirements for OpenLDAP. > Sounds like we have another volunteer to write an > "OperationalChanges" document... great. How the flipping Zithers should jimd@siu.edu, or I, or anyone else know what has been changed since the last time that he/she/it responsible for the change, changed it? I agree with jimd@siu.edu entirely, as far as the documentation of changes in operational procedures goes. Shame on the programmers for not keeping, or publishing, notes on what they've done. Quite another thing is the maintenance of the FAQ, which is so dismal, that I doubt that there is any other open source project that has such a worthless FAQ as Openldap (witness the frequent "How do I?" and lack of referrals to the FAQ in this group). I do realise, Kurt, that I'm hanging myself out on a line here. I and many others (most of them far more distinguished than myself) have written a couple of things here that *should* be added to the FAQ. - Motivation? - How? - Who gives a damn anyway? Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw The usefulness of RTFM is vastly overrated. e-post: tonni@billy.demon.nl www: http://www.billy.demon.nl gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428 Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356 GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981 3BE7B981
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel