[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Please keep to pure Openldap .-)
Hi list, hi Tony,
generally i agree.
But sometimes the people write to this list, because they think
that people here had the same LDAP-related problems, although
it hasn't directly to do with LDAP.
In my opinion that's not a problem for the list or for you and me.
As long as the percentage isn't to high we just should ignore it
or sometimes give the people who asked a hint where to look for
help on their question ...
Think of PAM. On the PAM-list they may say it`s a LDAP-problem
here we say it's a PAM-problem, who knows ....
The probabillity to find someone in this list who has to do with
LDAP and PAM is high, so the possibillity to find an answer is high too
..
greets Harry
PS.: I'm in different lists, specially in a LINUX-list, from where
i receive up to 500 mails/day. That's maybe why i don't have problems
with mails that don't belong directly to LDAP.
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>
> Given the recent spate of Apache/php questions on this list (that, thank
> God don't get answered), I can't help thinking that Apache users should
> use their own s*dd*ng mail groups, php users should use theirs and so
> on.
>
> Or, why are there so few Exim/ldap questions on this list? Because
> Exim/ldap users get their help on the Exim list. And that help is
> *perfect*.
>
> Life is difficult enough trying to cope with bare-bones Openldap.
>
> Best,
>
> Tony
>
> --
>
> Tony Earnshaw
>
> The usefulness of RTFM is vastly overrated.
>
> e-post: tonni@billy.demon.nl
> www: http://www.billy.demon.nl
> gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor
>
> Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428
> Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356
>
> GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981
> 3BE7B981
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: signature.asc
> signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature
> Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel