Hey,
Check out this patch.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2000/11/27/0001.html
Thanks for the info on this patch for web500gw! I tried it and it works.
I just had to specify some additional libraries in the Makefile
(sasl, ssl, crypto). We're on AIX.
It's up and running, I have to learn all about the configuration
now. I copied over what I could and have to figure out the rest.
I think there is a need for this software. I've searched and
haven't found a good replacement written in C. I do hope someone
picks it up and maintains it.
Jackie Hunt
Colorado State University
hi,
If you want to do the port.
Check out this patch.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2000/11/27/0001.html
Maybe someone could start a new project to maintain the source, looks
like the current beta has been out for about 4 years now.
PS. I started looking into getting it to compile ( I haven't tried the
patch ). I did not see the patch remove accesses to the members LDAP
structure. AFAIK, stuff like ld->ld_error was allowed in RFC1823 but
not in the current draft that OpenLDAP 2.x follows. So ld->ld_error has
to be replaced by the return param of ldap_err2string(), etc. I could
not find a similar function for ld->ld_match . Also ldap_set_option()
has to be used instead of assigning ld->ld_sizelimit. The RFC they use
is at ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1823.txt and the draft that OpenLDAP
uses is at
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-04.txt
Between the patch, and these small changes, I think web500gw would work
with the current OpenLDAP 2.x.
PS2. You probably should upgrade your OpenLDAP
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-announce/200201/msg00002.html
Redhat has updated RPMs on their FTP site.
--Kervin
Jackie Hunt wrote:
Hi all,
We are running web500gw with a Univ of Mich LDAP server. We're
finally moving on to OpenLDAP 2.0.11, but we'd like to keep web500gw
running. It has some nice features we'd hate to lose.
I've tried compiling it and run into incomplete struct errors.
I realize web500gw probably wasn't written to work with LDAP 2.0.11.
But I'm still wondering if anyone has it running with OpenLDAP and
if so, what version of ldap? Also, I'd be interested in hearing what
ldap-to-http gateways you are using and how well they run.
Thanks much for any info!
Jackie Hunt
ACNS Voice: (970) 663-3789
Colorado State University FAX: (970) 491-1958
Fort Collins, CO 80523 Email: jackie@yuma.acns.colostate.edu
Jackie Hunt
ACNS Voice: (970) 663-3789
Colorado State University FAX: (970) 491-1958
Fort Collins, CO 80523 Email: jackie@yuma.acns.colostate.edu