[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: LDAP and Active Directory
Actually, I do have a base but your suggestion got me going and I started
playing with the command and discovered I was using the wrong way of accesing
the base dn.
I was being stupid and not referencing the base correctly. I was using
o=ett-ldap (our base) as opposed to dc=ett-ldap. I am more familiar with the
o= style of naming than the dc= version. I thought they were interchangable.
As a follow on, I am curious as to why there are 2 ways of naming the base of
your LDAP tree an which is more appropriate? Any thoughts, suggestions?
Further, I can now peruse the who tree.
Thank You.
Brian
Geert Van Muylem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the output of the following command?
>
> ldapsearch -x -h [machine] -p 389 -b "" -s base
>
> I think that your problem is caused by a missing base...
>
> Regards,
> Geert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Brian Sullivan
> Sent: woensdag 1 mei 2002 15:55
> To: Mailing list OpenLdap
> Subject: LDAP and Active Directory
>
> Hate to ask AD questions here but I thought someone might be willing to help
> nonetheless. I am doing ldapsearch's against an Active Directory server and
> getting the following message.
>
> ldap_search: Operations error
> ldap_search: additional info: 000020D6: SvcErr: DSID-03100690, problem 5012
> (DIR_ERROR), data 0
>
> Anybody ever see this? The command I am using from Unix is
>
> ldapseasrch -h machine uid=myid
>
> myid exists in the Users branch. I have also specified the basedn -b ... to
> no
> avail. Any help would be apprecatiated.
>
> Brian
begin:vcard
n:Sullivan;Brian
tel;work:313-235-9036
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://lnx003.detroit.deco.com
org:DTE Energy;Information Systems
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:sullivanbj@dteenergy.com
note:http://lnx003.detroit.deco.com
x-mozilla-cpt:;12064
fn:Brian Sullivan
end:vcard