[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: uidNumber and >= filter



Also Sprach Norbert Klasen <norbert.klasen@daasi.de> on Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:24:57AM PST
> 
> 
> --On Donnerstag, 7. März 2002 13:45 -0800 Jason Heiss <jheiss@ofb.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Searching the archives of the mailing list leads me believe that
> > this is due to the schema entry for uidNumber.  Previous emails
> > with similar problems received replies about the EQUALITY setting
> > for the attribute.  What would be required for this sort of search
> > to work?  The admin guide and RFC 2252 seem a little out of sync on
> > this topic.
> 
> You would need an ORDERING matching rule. In this case, 
> integerOrderingMatch  which is currently not implemented in OpenLDAP.

Oh, thanks.  I think this answered the question I just
posted...

Wil
-- 
W. Reilly Cooley                           wcooley@nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting                        http://nakedape.cc
irc.linux.com                                     #orlug,#lnxs

The penalty for laughing in a courtroom is six months in jail; if it
were not for this penalty, the jury would never hear the evidence.
		-- H. L. Mencken

Attachment: pgpooDNvpRC9W.pgp
Description: PGP signature