[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Backsql faster then sleepycat dbm?
Thomas Cramer wrote:
>
> I do not think this is an easy yes or no question. It depends:
> What type of database?
> What type of ODBC drivers?
> Does the database use indexations?
> How many joins do you need to construct an attribute?
> Where is your database server with respect of the ldap server?
> etc
> etc
> I am currently working on revising back-sql. I haven't submitted any
> patches yet becuase I'm still working through the bugs (sorry). I am
> currently working with a sybase back-end (11.9.2.something) with DataDirect
> Linux ODBC Sybase Drivers, and openldap 2.0.18(?).
If you plan to submit patches (which in principle are always welcome :)
you should consider working at HEAD code; recently HEAD code saw a
significant API rewriting, so patches against older code would require
a loto of reworking and their review/acceptance could be significantly
delayed.
Pierangelo.
--
Dr. Pierangelo Masarati | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale | fax: +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano |
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy |
http://www.aero.polimi.it/~masarati