[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: misc.schema
At 04:03 PM 2002-01-08, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:45:47AM -0900, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
>> Should I be using a different OID? I mean, what is one to do without a
>> formal standard?
>
>you can always register your own OID tree with IANA.
>A better solution would be that it was standardized though,
>instead of everyone registering their own OID's for useful
>attributes only specified in drafts :)
>
>maybe I dont understand the OID concept completely, but some
>kind of "local" OID would be nice, kind of the privete IP address
>space.
There is experimental OID space (1.3.6.1.3.x) provided by IANA.
Also, 1.1.x is dead name space.
Of course, one should not use such OIDs except for experiments.
>I.e. I know my ldap server will never be accessed from outside
>my own network, and even if I had to in the future I could always
>register an official branch and slapcat/add the database (assuming
>oid's are used as database keys).
>
>I am using the broken technique of textual information for
>my local objectclasses/attrs (ABC.1.2 etc), but I expect
>to be bitten when I upgrade the next time because of the fixes :)
>
>
>> schu
>
>/Stefan
>
>>
>> Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>>
>> > At 11:20 AM 2002-01-08, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
>> >
>> >>That list has been dead for a long time... the last post is dated "Thu Apr 26 2001 - 18:53:54 PDT" Anyway, to answer the question, no, there has never been any decision on the OID. In my setup I am using 2.16.840.1.113.730.3.2.147
>> >>
>> >
>> > That's a improperly delegated OID. I suspect a typo of:
>> > 2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.147
>> >
>> > Kurt
>> >
>> >
>>