[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:45:58 +0100
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <3BF14281.1090608@imagestream.com>
References: <3BF01535.2070305@emperative.com> <1041.168.91.2.45.1005659944.squirrel@mail.ivy.tec.in.us> <20011113152355.E19393@wiggy.net> <3BF1356E.2020707@imagestream.com> <20011113161831.I19393@wiggy.net> <3BF13F80.9030306@imagestream.com> <20011113164916.J19393@wiggy.net> <3BF14281.1090608@imagestream.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.23i

Previously Richard June wrote:
> you're right. I'm thinking something wrong, but I'm not sure where.

Well, there is a difference between changing the password for which
you'll need it cleartext but only once, and authentication when you
can exchange hashes instead. For standard PAM you will need the
cleartext version in both cases.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: John Sanders <jsanders@sulross.edu>

References:
- RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: "Will Sarka" <wsarka@emperative.com>
- Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: "John Madden" <jmadden@ivy.tec.in.us>
- Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: Richard June <rjune@imagestream.com>
- Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: Richard June <rjune@imagestream.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
Next by Date: Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread