[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldap] LDAP C API status

To: Wei Wang <weiwang@interlinknetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [ldap] LDAP C API status
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:13:14 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <3BDF8540.3050703@interlinknetworks.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20011025155144.01753f60@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20011030164544.016b31d0@127.0.0.1>

At 08:59 PM 2001-10-30, Wei Wang wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>>At 07:20 PM 2001-10-29, Wei Wang wrote:
>>
>>>Anyways, I was interested to have found out from Mark Smith's response to a question that the LDAP_OPT_DESC option for ldap_get_option(). But then the code in OpenLDAP says that LDAP_OPT_DESC is deprecated. So should that be used?
>>For now, yes.  But realize that this option was removed from
>>the most recent IETF LDAP C API I-D and likely will be replaced
>>with something else eventually.
>
>Hmmm, I have actually went to IETF.org and searched for LDAP API drafts. But I didn't find what I was looking for. Could you give me a pointer to the latest LDAP C API draft? Thanks.

It's expired.  A fairly recent copy (the one which 2.0 implements)
is in doc/drafts.  (IIRC, subsequent revisions had little to no
changes.)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ldap] LDAP C API status
  - From: Stig Venaas <Stig@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- Re: [ldap] LDAP C API status
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: [ldap] LDAP C API status
  - From: Wei Wang <weiwang@interlinknetworks.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ldap] LDAP C API status
Next by Date: Re: Date Format
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread