[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: replication - write errors | even for me rootdn

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: replication - write errors | even for me rootdn
From: Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:33:06 -0500
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20010925120525.016a9f50@127.0.0.1>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010925111810.0172c758@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20010925111810.0172c758@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20010925120525.016a9f50@127.0.0.1>
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs

i can see for security reasons, but typically they have to have the same access
dont they?

-- 
Terry Davis
Systems Administrator
BirdDog Solutions, Inc.
(402) 829-6059


Quoting "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>:

> At 11:58 AM 2001-09-25, Terry Davis wrote:
> >Does the updatedn have to be different that the rootdn ?
> 
> No, they can be the same.  But this is not generally recommended.
> 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

References:
- Re: replication - write errors | even for me rootdn
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: replication - write errors | even for me rootdn
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: replication - write errors | even for me rootdn
Next by Date: OpenLDAP w/ root DN & DNS
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread