[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: feature roadmap
- To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Subject: RE: feature roadmap
- From: "Kevin J. McCarthy" <kevin@kogz.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:14:54 -0500
- Cc: <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Thread-index: AcE3xSolfiRm4bwnRNalX+ZEQDQl1gAAuyHQ
- Thread-topic: feature roadmap
Kurt,
Thanks for the answer. I am a bit frustrated that no such visibility
exists, but every single thing that the OpenLDAP produces is more than
we pay for and more than we should "expect".
Thank you for all your help; your efforts are appreciated.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Kevin J. McCarthy
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: feature roadmap
In regards to your 1. and 2. questions about when a particular feature
will
be implemented, the answer is "when it is". Due to the volunteer nature
of
the project, no schedules of availability are made available.
In regards to your 3. question, nesting of groups in 2.0 ACLs is not
supported.
In regards to your 4. question, yes, see the archives of this list.
In regards to your 5. question, yes. Seems a number of users are having
problems with our TLS/SSL (see archives of this list), however I am not
aware of any significant code flaw in OpenLDAP which prevents
interoperability. If there are such flaws, I would assume they have
been reported to the Issue Tracking System.
Kurt
>Here are the bullet
>points:
>
>1. When will access and schema be moved into the DIT?
>2. Will ACI attributes ever be inheritable by children?
>3. Can groups be nested? Are there checks for infinte loops or
deadlock?
>4. are there any real world benchmarks showing high usage?
>5. Any problems w/ SSL support?
>
>Thanks,
>Kevin