[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldapsearch filter - bad filter !!!!

To: "Fabrice Nouet" <f_nouet@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: ldapsearch filter - bad filter !!!!
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:00:44 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <F234Vk4k7HlZF6T3rl800013174@hotmail.com>

At 08:55 AM 2001-08-27, Fabrice Nouet wrote:
>I find strange behavior with ldapsearch command which worked with ldap v2 .

v2 and v3 are quite different.

>So a filter with "*" for objectclass does not work !!!!???

Yes. objectClass, of syntax OID, does not support substrings
matching.

>Someone knows why this restriction exists for ldap v3 ?

Actually, the restriction is in LDAPv2 as well.  It worked
in OpenLDAP 1.x due to the way syntaxes and matching rules
were implemented.

Kurt

References:
- ldapsearch filter - bad filter !!!!
  - From: "Fabrice Nouet" <f_nouet@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: No eq index on uniquemember allowed?
Next by Date: Re: ldapsearch filter - bad filter !!!!
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread