Re: openldap-slapd performance vs. Netscape-slapd ?

[Timo <timo@gerichhausen.de>]

"Jan Z." schrieb:
> 
> dear list,
> 
> I had openldap-1.2.11 running on an Indy R5000(256Mb Ram) with Irix 6.5.12.
> I choosed openldap because of it's good quality and the good experience I
> had with it on standard PC's.
> The ldif-file contains about 1550 users but unfortunately slapd had a lot of
> problems to search for users. To lookup up a simple users it takes
> approximately 5 sec's and CPU-load was at nearly 80-90 percent.
> So my boss was very unhappy with its performance so he told me to try
> Netscape 3.12 which is running perfectly fine on that kind of machine.
> What's the matter ? I don't really understand the difference of these both ?
> 
> regards,
> 
> Jan

Just a guess: Perhaps you have a problem with your indexes? I heard that
thats
a point where openldap and the netscape-version are a bit different...

I hope I could help
Timo