> From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:04:00 -0700
>
> At 04:37 PM 6/24/2001, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> >The machine is at 10.1.2.1 and I have two databases on the system. One is
>
> >replicated from another system and the other one lists only on this system
> .
> >The replicated database is at o=vircio,c=US and the local database is at
> >dc=deepeddy,dc=com.
> >
> >We do our searches against the localdatabase, but if things aren't found
> >we look in the replicated database.
> >
> >To do this, I've got an entry in the local database that looks like this:
> >
> >
> >dn: ref="ldap://10.1.2.1/o=vircio,c=US",dc=deepeddy,dc=com
> >objectclass: referral
> >ref: ldap://10.1.2.1/o=vircio,c=US
> >
> >In 1.2.11, this worked fine, but I can't seem to get it working under 2.0.
> 7.
>
> >Has the format of the referral object changed?
So my entry above should become:
dn: dc=subtree,dc=deepeddy,dc=com
objectClass: referral
objectClass: extensibleObject
dc: subtree
ref: ldap://10.1.2.1/o=vircio,c=US
I looked at that, but was confused since the example demonstrates a subtree of
the same name on another server rather than a redirection into a different
tree.
I want to make sure I really understand what I'm doing before I proceed
because I have to temporarily break my incoming mail to try anything.
> Yes. See Admin Guide for an example... and
> draft-zeilenga-ldapext-namedref-xx.txt for details.
where do I find this?
tar -ztvf openldap-stable-20010524.tgz |grep -i draft-zeilenga-ldapext-namedref
returns nothing.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com
4314 Avenue C
Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500
My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.
Attachment:
pgpVK4296Ie1F.pgp
Description: PGP signature