Re: partial replication & slurpd

[<liedekef@pandora.be>]

It's the wrong mail in the thread to reply to, but I deleted the other one
:)
There was talk about multiple replog directives in the conf file. Is this
possible? I thought there was always only 1 replogfile used for all
slaves?

Franky

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, ohasooo wrote:

>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:16:54 +0000 (UTC), masarati@aero.polimi.it
> (Pierangelo Masarati) wrote:
>
> >Tiefnig Daniel wrote:
> >
> >> a slave without a master isn't a slave, i'd say.. but.. if you don't
> >> want to have a master, where exactly is your problem..? read that flat
> >> updatefile and add the changes to your appropriate ldapservers.. (that's
> >> what slurpd does too..) you also might want to write out your
> >> updatefiles in "replication-format" and let slurpd contact your
> >> "slaves".. might be worth a try..
> >
> >If you work in one-shot mode, fine; otherwise
> >you'll have to deal with locks on the replog file ...
> >Anyway, unless you're very confident with your
> >ability to write correct ldif stuff, you'd better
> >use the api, that is use a master server and
> >ldap_add/modify/...*
>
> hm.. where's your problem with locks..? :o)
>
> and.. to use the ldap-clients, you'll not have to run a master.. it's
> sufficient to copy the client-binaries.. (and run them with the
> appropriate -h param)
> no need of a "master" in common sense, that's what i wanted to say..
>
> basically i'd prefer the one-shot mode too.. (depends wether a delay
> of half an hour or a quater matters or not..)
>
> daniel
>